The textual paradigm of context and textual dematerialism

The textual paradigm of context and textual dematerialism

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between feminine and masculine. In a sense, Foucault suggests the use of textual socialism to challenge the status quo. A number of narratives concerning not desituationism, but neodesituationism exist.

But the fatal flaw, and some would say the paradigm, of presemiotic appropriation intrinsic to Burroughs’s Naked Lunch is also evident in Queer. The subject is contextualised into a textual paradigm of context that includes narrativity as a paradox.

Thus, Bataille promotes the use of presemiotic appropriation to analyse and attack society. Many discourses concerning the textual paradigm of context may be discovered.

It could be said that Lacan’s critique of presemiotic appropriation states that the goal of the reader is significant form. The primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the failure of preconstructive consciousness.

2. Burroughs and the textual paradigm of context

“Society is elitist,” says Sontag; however, according to Hamburger[1] , it is not so much society that is elitist, but rather the economy, and eventually the futility, of society. In a sense, in Junky, Burroughs affirms presemiotic appropriation; in The Ticket that Exploded, however, he reiterates the textual paradigm of context. Bataille uses the term ‘Foucaultist power relations’ to denote not narrative, as presemiotic appropriation suggests, but subnarrative.

“Class is part of the meaninglessness of art,” says Derrida. It could be said that if textual dematerialism holds, we have to choose between semanticist objectivism and the precultural paradigm of narrative. Parry[2] suggests that the works of Burroughs are reminiscent of Lynch.

The main theme of Hamburger’s[3] model of textual dematerialism is the difference between sexual identity and class. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a textual paradigm of context that includes truth as a whole. Several structuralisms concerning a precultural reality exist.

Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a that includes sexuality as a whole. Sontag uses the term ‘textual dematerialism’ to denote the genre, and subsequent stasis, of conceptualist society.

However, Debord suggests the use of subdialectic capitalist theory to challenge class divisions. Textual dematerialism states that the establishment is dead.

Thus, the characteristic theme of the works of Burroughs is the common ground between sexual identity and class. In The Soft Machine, Burroughs deconstructs presemiotic appropriation; in Naked Lunch he examines textual dematerialism.

It could be said that if the textual paradigm of context holds, we have to choose between presemiotic appropriation and neosemioticist deappropriation. The primary theme of Hanfkopf’s[4] essay on dialectic sublimation is a self-justifying totality.

3. Textual dematerialism and Debordist situation

If one examines Debordist situation, one is faced with a choice: either reject the textual paradigm of context or conclude that art is capable of intentionality. But d’Erlette[5] suggests that the works of Burroughs are an example of mythopoetical objectivism. If Debordist situation holds, we have to choose between the textual paradigm of context and semanticist precultural theory.

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the concept of capitalist language. It could be said that the example of the postcultural paradigm of consensus depicted in Burroughs’s Queer emerges again in Port of Saints, although in a more material sense. Lyotard’s critique of Debordist situation states that reality serves to reinforce sexism, given that consciousness is distinct from language.

In a sense, Marx promotes the use of neodialectic structuralist theory to analyse art. The premise of Debordist situation implies that discourse is created by the collective unconscious.

It could be said that Parry[6] states that we have to choose between the textual paradigm of context and the precultural paradigm of expression. The subject is interpolated into a that includes language as a whole.

In a sense, if textual dematerialism holds, we have to choose between the textual paradigm of context and modernist appropriation. Derrida suggests the use of textual dematerialism to attack outmoded perceptions of society.

4. Consensuses of meaninglessness

The characteristic theme of the works of Burroughs is the failure, and some would say the stasis, of postcultural class. It could be said that the dialectic paradigm of reality holds that the purpose of the artist is deconstruction. In Queer, Burroughs affirms Debordist situation; in The Ticket that Exploded, although, he examines subsemanticist constructive theory.

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between closing and opening. But the premise of the textual paradigm of context states that government is part of the collapse of sexuality. A number of deconstructions concerning textual dematerialism may be found.

“Society is fundamentally responsible for sexism,” says Foucault. Thus, Dahmus[7] holds that the works of Burroughs are modernistic. Sontag uses the term ‘the textual paradigm of context’ to denote a mythopoetical reality.

In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a that includes language as a totality. If Debordist situation holds, we have to choose between textual dematerialism and neocapitalist sublimation.

But the subject is interpolated into a textual paradigm of context that includes art as a reality. La Fournier[8] implies that we have to choose between deconstructivist libertarianism and postdialectic discourse.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a that includes culture as a paradox. Debord uses the term ‘textual socialism’ to denote the role of the poet as participant.

However, in Reservoir Dogs, Tarantino denies textual dematerialism; in Jackie Brown, however, he affirms the textual paradigm of context. Lyotard’s essay on textual dematerialism suggests that language is capable of truth, given that the premise of the textual paradigm of context is invalid.

——————————————————————————–

1. Hamburger, H. ed. (1995) Deconstructing Realism: Textual dematerialism and the textual paradigm of context. University of Michigan Press

2. Parry, U. R. B. (1989) The textual paradigm of context and textual dematerialism. Harvard University Press

3. Hamburger, R. Z. ed. (1975) The Failure of Narrativity: Textual dematerialism, feminism and material theory. And/Or Press

4. Hanfkopf, L. M. G. (1999) Textual dematerialism and the textual paradigm of context. University of California Press

5. d’Erlette, N. I. ed. (1987) The Broken Key: Textual dematerialism, subcultural depatriarchialism and feminism. University of Illinois Press

6. Parry, B. R. Q. (1978) Textual dematerialism in the works of Joyce. Cambridge University Press

7. Dahmus, O. P. ed. (1981) Reassessing Modernism: The textual paradigm of context and textual dematerialism. University of Massachusetts Press

8. la Fournier, J. (1994) The textual paradigm of context in the works of Tarantino. University of Illinois Press

——————————————————————————–

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link. If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 3056922 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational. It is being served from a machine in Seattle, Washington, USA.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks”. An on-line copy is available from Monash University.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.